Should the Future of Root Cause Medicine Include Engineered Food? This Might Make You Think
We think this might be controversial – let us know your thoughts! As a functional medicine clinician, our daily work often revolves around a simple yet profound philosophy: the body has an innate ability to heal if we remove the obstacles and provide the right inputs. For decades, the “right inputs” have often been synonymous with “back to basics,” including whole, unprocessed foods and organic farming. The image this conjures is of going back to our traditional agricultural roots. We have long viewed “engineered food” as the problem, the very source of the ultra-processed, hyper-palatable “food-like substances” that drive the chronic disease epidemic we see today. Now a new report, “Engineering Food Systems to Enable Precision Nutrition,” recently released by the Engineering Research Visioning Alliance (ERVA) and supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation, demands a reconsideration of the boundaries of our field. Its central argument is provocative: while nutrition problems manifest biologically, they cannot be solved through biological research alone. The translation of personalized, root-cause care into scalable, population-level health is currently constrained not by our lack of biological discovery, but by our lack of engineering capability.









